Moderator: ADGO BOD
Funky Bobby J wrote:Don't forget that some of us want to play Superclass at Flyboy too - make sure we have a division for Superclass Intermediate Masters... I am coming after you Vern!!!
grease wrote:I failed to mention that I will be the TD for the AM side of the AO this year, so I can answer any AM questions. Tracy, sign up as ADV woman or Int men and put in the special comments section that you would like to play Int woman. Have anyone else that would like to play Int woman do the same. Once again, if enough Int ladies sign up to make the division requirements, then that will happen.
Pro/AM Flyboy and JP Mosley
Pros at JP Mosley on Sat - two rounds of 18
Pros at Flyboy on Sunday - one round of 27
Ams Flyboy Sat 27 and JP Sunday 36 holes.
Cha Ching wrote:...
You would rather watch somebody play a tourney, than play in it yourself![]()
Bootsie wrote:on a more serious note: why wasnt this thing scheduled the weekend after on the 23-24 of april. seems to me that the flow of tourneys in georgia would have been alot better. being that theres an A-tier the following weekend in augusta on the 30th-may 1 and a womens only tourney the weekend after thats back at flyboy. Also, not to mention that theres a ton of tourneys the weekend that the Atl open is scheduled on currently thats going to take away from what the magnitude of this tourney could be.
Moose wrote:I will be bringing 2 kegs of Sweetwater to Flyboy. They were very generous to help us out again this year in sponsoring our "player party/fly mart". Obviously this will not be enough for the whole weekend so you might want to bring some of your own to Flyboy. If you do bring beer try to bring cans. Bottles are more cumbersome and could endanger a plane taking off or landing if broken on the runway. We should all have the true camper attitude when it comes to Flyboy. PACK IT IN....PACK IT OUT. Thanks for your help in keeping this venue alive and in the good graces of the community. Thanks for your understanding on this matter. I will also be cooking food for nominal cost on Saturday and Sunday at Flyboy.
billnchristy wrote:^Is this guy some kind of mega spam bot?
Did somebody make an Evil bizarro Watson already?
mrpbody33 wrote:Well since both courses are either near or surrounding grass runways maybe someone needs to explore the option of flights between the two locations.



jritger wrote:probably like 1 hr & 15 min. you'd want to stay @ flyboy, there is a keg and camping
Moose wrote:Grip equipment is now a sponsor. We will have a bag for raffle and probably one to the winner of AM.
http://www.grip-eq.com/
Moose wrote:Any news on the tap for a keg (bhuff)...I need someone who can get me a tap for a regular keg before may 14th. Please email me if you have one and can get it to me or bring it on Friday April 15th to Flyboy.
email tonym@remax.net
mr.disc wrote:go to a likra store...![]()
![]()
![]()
richardhead wrote:mr.disc wrote:go to a likra store...![]()
![]()
![]()
Do what your daddy tells you and go to the likra store.......regg neck!!

grease wrote:Here's what we got in:
Glo CFR Champion Leopard-$20
Glo CFR Champion Wraith-$20
Glo Champion Gazelle-$20
CFR Champion Make-$20
Champion Destroyer(some real flat tops)-$15
KC Roc-$12
Jk Aviar-$12
Pro Katana-$12
R-Pro XD-$12
DX Aviar Driver-$10
DX Aviar(super grippy)-$10
DX Roc-$10
Bob at Disc Cadidie has some of each at his store and I will be carrying some around to sell.
Randgolf wrote:Thanks again to the AMS you guys are always better than the pros![]()
IMPRESARIO wrote:Is there an upcoming date that we cam play Flyboy in prep for the Open?
grease wrote:On another note, the Intermediate and Rec fields will be playing the short tees at Moseley, and there will be a short course set up Friday morning for these fields at Flyboy.
arrdee33 wrote:This short layout at flyboy, is it for practice, or is there some totally new "short" layout for the tourny play?
So, which is it?grease wrote:Play at Flyboy Friday prior to the tournament is limited to people signed up for the AO only........somewhat confined to tournament players only.
grease wrote:Last count I saw showed only 5 am spots left Probably filled by now. Weak pro show. Only 29 spots filled? Come on folks! Are Kenny and Dave scaring you? Much added cash on the line and this kind of low show? Oh well, those that make it will reap the benefits.
grease wrote:arrdee33 wrote:This short layout at flyboy, is it for practice, or is there some totally new "short" layout for the tourny play?
I don't understand this question.
Play at Flyboy Friday prior to the tournament is limited to people signed up for the AO only and not a free for all. We have to keep it somewhat confined to tournament players only.
Here4Beer wrote:Rand,
Is Moze #11 going to play as an island hole in the AO? Saw the rock circle around the basket but no mention of it that I could find anywhere on the course guides.
DanO
dandaman wrote:I've got two local Pro's as my dark horses to win this event. I won't mention them publicly as not to put the chicken claw crawl on them, but if they win, I'll say: I told you so!
dandaman wrote:I've got two local Pro's as my dark horses to win this event. I won't mention them publicly as not to put the chicken claw crawl on them, but if they win, I'll say: I told you so!
BTW hate to point out a fellow bagger, but a 910 rated player does not need to be playing Rec. Love you Phillip! Move up with your other fellow baggers for the chance to qualify for the USDGC!
grease wrote:How can you say I told you so if you don't tell us?
dandaman wrote: How about instead of following the top pro's around for two days you play with them instead?
grease wrote:It will be shotgun start. I'll try to have someone towards the middle of the course to help relay the start.
keith johnson wrote:Where did my posts go? - They broke no message board rules or had any negative or inflammatory things in them.
JPZ wrote:dandaman wrote: How about instead of following the top pro's around for two days you play with them instead?
1.) Why? is there something wrong w/ watching a top pro play ones home course?
2.) Obviously you get to see that all the time , eh?
3.) Are you sponsoring or are you still blowing leaves?
dandaman wrote:I've got two local Pro's as my dark horses to win this event. I won't mention them publicly as not to put the chicken claw crawl on them, but if they win, I'll say: I told you so!
BTW hate to point out a fellow bagger, but a 910 rated player does not need to be playing Rec. Love you Phillip! Move up with your other fellow baggers for the chance to qualify for the USDGC!
Wookie wrote:The Ams can sign up as Pros and play on that side correct? Just cost a little more right?
Woodrow wrote:Nothing in the moderator log....hmmmm..sure you posted them?
keith johnson wrote:
There is no cap for AM Ratings.
keith johnson wrote:...... the posts WERE on line when I left.
Any (required for 935+)
$Dollar$ wrote:better question- Why would someone rated that high want to play AM anyway? I'll stick with my theory that Am baggers must eat plastic.
$Dollar$ wrote:Is JP Mosley set up in the correct AO positions?
i2rt wrote:keith johnson wrote:
There is no cap for AM Ratings.
Please explain.
He has been rated 973 since 22-Jun-2010.
Has there been a ratings/division rules change?
I know he doesn't have to take cash but he has to play his rating/division.
You only get to play below your rating/division in the year that your rating pushes into the new division.
http://www.pdga.com/files/documents/Pla ... onGrid.pdf
Randgolf wrote:The website wasn't up and ready in time or me to factor it into the budget. It will not be up at this point.
There are still a few spots open in the Am field. If you were considering playing you need to sign up asap.
arrdee33 wrote:Without an official website, where might we find info on tee times, check-in, players party?
a schedule in other words.
Randgolf wrote:Shotgun start at 10 am at Mosley on Sat. Pros play at Mosley on Sat two rounds of 18. Players meeting at 9:15am.
vercingetorix wrote:A schedule of events would be really helpful considering the website is not an option. I'm coming from out of town, and am currently trying to figure out how to manage all the driving so an exact schedule of events for the weekend would be helpful! thanks in advance and see you all there
grease wrote:Flyboy will be open for play all day Friday (4-15) before the tournament. Rand-um draw doubles will be at 3:00 p.m. for $10. Unfortunately, since it's private property and some rumps acted up out there, groups must now be escorted thus limiting the play times.
dandaman wrote:$Dollar$ wrote:Is JP Mosley set up in the correct AO positions?
Yes all pins are in their correct setting. We're using all golds except 13 which we will be playing from black.
Dr. Manhattan wrote:dandaman wrote:$Dollar$ wrote:Is JP Mosley set up in the correct AO positions?
Yes all pins are in their correct setting. We're using all golds except 13 which we will be playing from black.
Golds for both rounds for Ams?
grease wrote: What did players do 5 years ago before the computer hand fed you all the answers?
grease wrote:figure it out on your own. What did players do 5 years ago before the computer hand fed you all the answers?
408man wrote:grease wrote: What did players do 5 years ago before the computer hand fed you all the answers?
Hmm, maybe failed the official's test?
drich673 wrote:Hey, Is it possible to un-register for this Tourney? I am registered Mens Rec, and I have some urgent family business that has come up for next weekend. I don't care about the $$ so much as my rating getting ruined if I am counted as a no-show. Can someone please let me know?
grease wrote:Sorry for the delayed response, but I have had login issues. If this doesn't answer your questions, scroll through this thread and figure it out on your own. What did players do 5 years ago before the computer hand fed you all the answers?
Check in will be 8:30-9:30 A.M
Players meeting will be 9:30 and may take a little longer at Flyboy
Start time for AM's at Flyboy is shotgun and 10:00 A.M. or so depending on the players meeting
Players meeting at Mosely 9:30 A.M>
Start time at Mosely is 10:00 A.M.
No players party per se except for the keg at Flyboy Friday and Saturday night, plus Moose's cooking.
Flymart will be wherever the AM's are as Wes Campbell will be there with his goodies, Bob from Disc Caddie will have an abundance of special discs, and I will have some private stash and Atlanta Open custom stamped discs available.
I apologize for coming off short, but I have had the same questions asked over and over again. The times I just posted could have been copied from a tournament ten years ago. They are and have been the times we and most of the country have used for as long as I can remember. Forgive me for being old school, I just remember when we could add, navigate, and generally think for ourselves before the advent of the computer.
arrdee33 wrote:grease wrote:figure it out on your own. What did players do 5 years ago before the computer hand fed you all the answers?
Geee, thanks "TD", I guess your right, an out of town barney should just figure it out on his own.
I have no idea what players did 5 years ago, I wasnt playing then. (as the majory of the AM field i assume)
In the age of all this great tech, one might expect the info somewhere on a computer.
and btw, I scoured this thread for a AM tee-time/schedule and I didn't find it on my own, because it wasn't there....Mosleys times were, but how can I expect the same.
blah blah blah, who cares right, enough whining.
Thanks for posting the info, I can now plan travel times, and thats all I was really trying to do.
Thanks Kelly as well, for the added info about Flyboy, I'm really looking forward to the event and when its all over, all this bickering will be behind us.
Like I said earlier, Im not dogging anyone here, I just wanted that hand feeding of info
Randgolf wrote:The Atlanta Open is on!
PDGA SUPER TOUR Atier event
Pro/AM Flyboy and JP Mosley
Pros at JP Mosley on Sat - two rounds of 18 Players meeting at 9:30 tee off at 10am
Pros at Flyboy on Sunday - one round of 27 tee time at 10am
AM at Flyboy on Sat 9:30 players meeting 10am tee off
AM at JP Mosley on Sunday 10am tee off
Bhuff wrote:Probably stupid question but wanted to make sure...My GF/SO is wanting to come along with my for the DG/camping experience. Will this be a problem having her caddy for me and hanging out outside of tournament play..? Thanks
Randgolf wrote:Collared shirts are not required, but they are prefered. I would love to see all of the competitors dress to impress. We will have corporate representatives on sight. Wearing a collared shirt or a drifit tshirt just makes everyone look like less of a neck than disc golfers are automatically assumed to be. Wear what you want but understand that you are representing the sport of disc golf, PDGA, Atlanta Open, and yourself.
Don't be offended by the "neck" comment. I likley am the most obvious neck out of all of us
Clunck wrote:First part of the first post
noputtinsavage wrote:might be making a cameo on Sunday???????
noputtinsavage wrote:might be making a cameo on Sunday???????

Moose wrote:I will be at Flyboy from Thursday evening thru Sunday night for your stomach's pleasure
Menu for Mooses general store includes the following:
Breakfast
big biscuits with either sausage or bacon, egg and cheese
Lunch, Dinner & late night
Boston Butt 1/2 pound sandwiches smoked in a la caja china box including 3 gourmet BBQ sauces (2 Gomez & 1 Moose)
1/3 pound burgers from Halpern's
10 inch Hebrew National all beef frankfurter's.
All of the sandwiches will be on buns from Alon's award winning bakery.
I will also have waters and gatorade for sale and a couple of Sweetwater Kegs (420 & IPA)
I will be taking pre-orders for breakfast the night before and lunch orders after players meetings on both Sat. and Sun. You will still be able to eat if you don't take advantage of this. It is just something I am trying out so that I can smoothly get you fed hot food as fast as possible so you can relax and not have to be in a line.
Look forward to meeting a bunch of new people and seeing all my old friends.


Mike D wrote:PDGA SUPERSTORE??
This ad was on the bottom of this weeks flyer...
Anyone know details??
Who is running this event?

Randgolf wrote:Steve Dodge is running the Vibram event at the PGA TOUR SUPERSTORE.
Randgolf wrote:AO 2011 Hole Lengths and Pars
Flyboy, Length, Par
1 510 4
2 440 3
3 780 5
4 533 3
5 285 3
6 300 3
7 1080 5
8 250 3
9 530 4
10 465 4
11 290 3
12 190 3
13 520 4
14 310 3
15 960 5
16 220 3
17 310 3
18 315 3
Total 8288 64
19 400 3
20 465 4
21 400 3
22 253 3
23 390 3
24 710 4
25 250 3
26 300 3
27 700 5
Total 3868 31
combined 27 12156 95
Average FB 450.22 3.52
JPM, Length, Par
1 636 4
2 189 3
3 298 3
4 276 3
5 275 3
6 251 3
7 300 3
8 940 5
9 1030 5
10 443 3
11 308 3
12 501 3
13 1082 5
14 308 3
15 285 3
16 259 3
17 348 3
18 500 3
Total 8229 61
Average JPM 457.17 3.39
Average AO 2011 453 3.47
The above work is thanks to Wade Selph
A: A little shorter.Henderson wrote:Got this info for Rec lengths?
Cyoda44 wrote:Will players be required to comply with the dress code? Collared shirts... No "Tshirts"
IMPRESARIO wrote:I see two World Champs in attendance. Am I missing someone else?
IMPRESARIO wrote:I see two World Champs in attendance. Am I missing someone else?
Dr. Manhattan wrote:So who qualified for the fake USDGC?
D-Wiz wrote:Dr. Manhattan wrote:So who qualified for the fake USDGC?
If it were you that qualified, would you play in it or is it below your moral d-golf standards now that it is "fake"?
Dr. Manhattan wrote:D-Wiz wrote:Dr. Manhattan wrote:So who qualified for the fake USDGC?
If it were you that qualified, would you play in it or is it below your moral d-golf standards now that it is "fake"?
No I wouldnt play in it. Playing in it would be supporting Innova's decision to change the tournament so no I would not play if I qualified. I was just wondering who did qualify so the players can get a better idea of how they are qualifying people.
Randgolf wrote:It looks like the "bagger" has only played one PDGA tournament. He is a good player, but one event doesn't really give the most accurate rating. Lets see how he does in this year's AO.
billnchristy wrote:
If it were you that qualified, would you play in it or is it below your moral d-golf standards now that it is "fake"?
billnchristy wrote:I agree that it shouldn't be called the USDGC and you are right they probably are making a mint on it but they have probably lost 10x that over the years paying for the USDGC.
It might just be amusing seeing some low rated ams play the course...of course it might not be because the drop in distance may just minimize OB compared to a lot of the big arm pros.
You have to admit though, there are probably what, 30 people that really have a shot so the field was already pretty bogus...even if we bump it to 50.
Woodrow wrote:FANTASTIC job by everyone involved! One of my best DG experiences ever! Thank you, thank you, thank you!
On another note: I left my dark grey fleece vest on the bench on the hangar pad out at Flyboy Sunday. Anyone know where it is now?
Exceeds the hype.
billnchristy wrote:Sarah just told me something that Jeremy Kolling said about Flyboy and I thought it was worthy of sharing:Exceeds the hype.
You really cannot say it better.
Henderson wrote:Complaints.....
Now I just wanted to add in.... This being a "A-tier" event, and even though there was only 5 Rec players, I am sorely unhappy with both the payout (combined first and second was less than one persons entry fee!?) and we can't even blame it on 1st place getting a trophy... because Rec didn't get one.
Beyond that, the so called players award ceremony was something I would expect to see at a Sub "C-Tier" event.. There was absolutely no excitement at all... With 2 or 3 divisions going into sudden death I expected a lot more. Maybe it was my fault for expecting more... maybe not.. I will say this though, EVERY Single other "B" and "C" tier event I have participated in (7 to date) have announced scores for the pay outs or at least the top 3 and told how close the race was. This was my first look into an "A" tier event, and maybe all the negatives would have been worth it if my weekend was a week prior or later so I could watch the pros throw the same course I would/have played. I am not impressed at all with how this panned out. Hopefully someone will see this and consider making some adjustments to make it a more memorable event (in the positive instead of the negative)
billnchristy wrote:That's what I love about this place, always ultra positive responses to criticism.
Keep up the great work ADGO!
grease wrote:Henderson wrote:Complaints.....
Now I just wanted to add in.... This being a "A-tier" event, and even though there was only 5 Rec players, I am sorely unhappy with both the payout (combined first and second was less than one persons entry fee!?) and we can't even blame it on 1st place getting a trophy... because Rec didn't get one.
Beyond that, the so called players award ceremony was something I would expect to see at a Sub "C-Tier" event.. There was absolutely no excitement at all... With 2 or 3 divisions going into sudden death I expected a lot more. Maybe it was my fault for expecting more... maybe not.. I will say this though, EVERY Single other "B" and "C" tier event I have participated in (7 to date) have announced scores for the pay outs or at least the top 3 and told how close the race was. This was my first look into an "A" tier event, and maybe all the negatives would have been worth it if my weekend was a week prior or later so I could watch the pros throw the same course I would/have played. I am not impressed at all with how this panned out. Hopefully someone will see this and consider making some adjustments to make it a more memorable event (in the positive instead of the negative)
First-There wasn't even supposed to be a Rec division. That was a mistake(on who's part I can't really note), but we let the people who got in before the option to play Rec was shut down either move up or stay in Rec. Basically, we wanted everyone to play the same course and not have to make any special concessions for a lower division, but we did anyway.
Second-If you noticed on the payout sheet it showed deductions for players adding up to $34 per player. That included $25 for the players pack(retail was over $40), $5 players fee for Flyboy and $4 for the PDGA. rec only paid $40 vs. $60 for all the other AM divisions. The math adds up to 5 Rec players at $6 left after fees or $30.We bumped it up to $35.
Third-Only divisions with 6 ore more players had trophies ordered. The Pro Females, Rec, and Advanced Grandmasters had less than that thus no trophy.
Fourth-You saw the amount of help I had and I was doing my best to move things along, but was pressured from many people to just get their vouchers and leave. I usually have an awards ceremony that includes all players and not just the winners.
There won't be a Rec. division next year.
Thanks everyone for the negative comments. It is very appreciated and makes taking time off and spare time that I have(which is not much) to help run this event seem worth it. Won't see you next year.
Henderson wrote:First off let me say, I had an extremely good time this past weekend. Flyboy was amazing and I hope we can have more events there! J.P. was everything I expected. Moose did an outstanding job keeping us fed! I could go on and on, but I just want to thank everyone who had a part in putting on this event.
grease wrote: First-There wasn't even supposed to be a Rec division. That was a mistake(on who's part I can't really note), but we let the people who got in before the option to play Rec was shut down either move up or stay in Rec. Basically, we wanted everyone to play the same course and not have to make any special concessions for a lower division, but we did anyway.
grease wrote:Second-If you noticed on the payout sheet it showed deductions for players adding up to $34 per player. That included $25 for the players pack(retail was over $40), $5 players fee for Flyboy and $4 for the PDGA. rec only paid $40 vs. $60 for all the other AM divisions. The math adds up to 5 Rec players at $6 left after fees or $30.We bumped it up to $35.
grease wrote:Third-Only divisions with 6 ore more players had trophies ordered. The Pro Females, Rec, and Advanced Grandmasters had less than that thus no trophy.
grease wrote:Fourth-You saw the amount of help I had and I was doing my best to move things along, but was pressured from many people to just get their vouchers and leave. I usually have an awards ceremony that includes all players and not just the winners.
grease wrote:There won't be a Rec. division next year.
grease wrote:Thanks everyone for the negative comments. It is very appreciated and makes taking time off and spare time that I have(which is not much) to help run this event seem worth it. Won't see you next year.
grease wrote:Patrick,
I agree that his complaints were not unfounded, but I posted what I did to shed some light on the situation. It gets real frustrating when you run a tournament, put your heart and soul into it, and get negative comments. I'm not going to drop in the normal comeback here. I get nothing for doing this except the appreciation of the players. II mentioned earlier about players helping out but didn't mention you. Thank you Patrick Kellner for helping add up scorecards. Also, at every other tournament I have run or been involved with, there is an awards ceremony that gives everyone credit for their accomplishment. I hope this and my previous posts are presented in a respectable manner. I held off from using any expletives which was really hard for me to do. Thanks for playing the AO this year everyone and have a nice day.
richardhead wrote:Grease, I appreciate you. I wasn't there, but I have seen first hand how you work your ass off. You, like Rand, put on top notch events and anyone that has been around knows that.
Henderson wrote:First off let me say, I had an extremely good time this past weekend. Flyboy was amazing and I hope we can have more events there! J.P. was everything I expected. Moose did an outstanding job keeping us fed! I could go on and on, but I just want to thank everyone who had a part in putting on this event.
richardhead wrote:Personally, I don't think there should be a rec division. I don't remember there being so much bitching back when it was Intermediate, Advanced, Open, and Age Protected divisions. Should be that way still. With all of these lower divisions they should be playing for a player's pack and a a trophy. Lower there entry fee's next time. As if paying $34 to play 2 world class courses wasn't enough.
richardhead wrote:I played The Stoney Hill Challenge a few weeks back. It was a C-Tier that was played on the Sauls Brothers private course. The payouts were very low, but with it being a c-tier they had no requirements to meet. I didn't hear one gripe from a single player about the payouts. The chance to play a world class course made it all worth while. Stoney Hill is a must play BTW. Instant Top 3 in my book!
richardhead wrote:Anyway, keep on keeping on. There's always going to be gripes, you can't please everyone. I guess you won't be seeing that gentleman at the PPIC, which is another Top Notch Georiga Tournament!! I won't charge you for that promotion.lol
richardhead wrote:PPIC, which is another Top Notch Georiga Tournament!!
grease wrote:Henderson wrote:Complaints.....
Now I just wanted to add in.... This being a "A-tier" event, and even though there was only 5 Rec players, I am sorely unhappy with both the payout (combined first and second was less than one persons entry fee!?) and we can't even blame it on 1st place getting a trophy... because Rec didn't get one.
Beyond that, the so called players award ceremony was something I would expect to see at a Sub "C-Tier" event.. There was absolutely no excitement at all... With 2 or 3 divisions going into sudden death I expected a lot more. Maybe it was my fault for expecting more... maybe not.. I will say this though, EVERY Single other "B" and "C" tier event I have participated in (7 to date) have announced scores for the pay outs or at least the top 3 and told how close the race was. This was my first look into an "A" tier event, and maybe all the negatives would have been worth it if my weekend was a week prior or later so I could watch the pros throw the same course I would/have played. I am not impressed at all with how this panned out. Hopefully someone will see this and consider making some adjustments to make it a more memorable event (in the positive instead of the negative)
First-There wasn't even supposed to be a Rec division. That was a mistake(on who's part I can't really note), but we let the people who got in before the option to play Rec was shut down either move up or stay in Rec. Basically, we wanted everyone to play the same course and not have to make any special concessions for a lower division, but we did anyway.
Second-If you noticed on the payout sheet it showed deductions for players adding up to $34 per player. That included $25 for the players pack(retail was over $40), $5 players fee for Flyboy and $4 for the PDGA. rec only paid $40 vs. $60 for all the other AM divisions. The math adds up to 5 Rec players at $6 left after fees or $30.We bumped it up to $35.
Third-Only divisions with 6 ore more players had trophies ordered. The Pro Females, Rec, and Advanced Grandmasters had less than that thus no trophy.
Fourth-You saw the amount of help I had and I was doing my best to move things along, but was pressured from many people to just get their vouchers and leave. I usually have an awards ceremony that includes all players and not just the winners.
There won't be a Rec. division next year.
Thanks everyone for the negative comments. It is very appreciated and makes taking time off and spare time that I have(which is not much) to help run this event seem worth it. Won't see you next year.
grease wrote:Richard, congrats on the win. Mr. Henderson, nothing personal. I met both of you and shook your hands with smiles on you faces even after the awards.
i2rt wrote:My comments on all the comments....
I hear everyone saying "I you just would have ask I would have helped", personally I don't call that volunteering, I call it making the TD beg for mercy.
Please people, if you want to help, then help, don't wait until the TD melts down and then say "if you just would have ask, I would have helped." Volunteer means exactly that.
The workload for this tournament was the highest I have ever seen and I just got done helping with the 2010 Pro Worlds. I WILL be back next year to help, not play, because I love this event as much as any I have been a part of.
Come on 2012 AO we are ready for you.
DaltonDiscMan wrote:After playing this w/e, I need some help. On hole 5 at F.B. & holes 9 and 13 at Moseley, the tee pads were on the designated O.B.(walking path). I assume this is legal (I've played black 13 for as long as I can remember). Something about it seems counter-intuitive to me. Is this specifically addressed in the rule book?
me wrote:The walking paths that are throughout the course play as man-made creeks. Completely surrounded by asphalt is OB. Exceptions to that rule are the gold tees on # 9 and 11, the black tee on #13 and the drop zone on #11.
billnchristy wrote:The rules say that you can never throw from OB so in these cases I would assume they are considered an island of not OB.
In the case of FB #5 (I dont know JP Moseley) the road may be OB for other holes but it is kind of pointless to be OB for that hole so you can probably solve the problem and just say it isn't OB in this case.
DaltonDiscMan wrote:After playing this w/e, I need some help. On hole 5 at F.B. & holes 9 and 13 at Moseley, the tee pads were on the designated O.B.(walking path). I assume this is legal (I've played black 13 for as long as I can remember). Something about it seems counter-intuitive to me. Is this specifically addressed in the rule book?
Here4Beer wrote:DaltonDiscMan wrote:After playing this w/e, I need some help. On hole 5 at F.B. & holes 9 and 13 at Moseley, the tee pads were on the designated O.B.(walking path). I assume this is legal (I've played black 13 for as long as I can remember). Something about it seems counter-intuitive to me. Is this specifically addressed in the rule book?
Not sure what the confusion is. Paved pads are normally better than non-paved surfaces. At F.B., the road is part of a nice community where you can't go chunking down slabs of concrete for DG. #5 pad is nicely placed IMO. Perhaps you could think of it as an equivalent to casual water if that helps.
To answer your rule book question, see http://www.pdga.com/rules/80401-special-conditions
A. Rules governing special conditions that may exist on the course shall be clearly defined and disseminated to all players prior to the start of the tournament. All special conditions shall be covered in the players' meeting. Each player is responsible for adhering to all points covered in the player's meeting.
nixonrocks wrote:I know the clips are on YouTube, but are they gonna make this into a Clash DVD available for purchase?
i2rt wrote:nixonrocks wrote:I know the clips are on YouTube, but are they gonna make this into a Clash DVD available for purchase?
Yes it will be a video...in about 6 months.
Please tell me where you have seen FlyBoy Clash video. I would like to see what there is out there.
dandaman wrote:Am I the only one having trouble viewing the you tube videos? They keep coming back as they are "private"
Woodrow wrote:I believe(from rumor) it was a DQ, not a quit. About time.
Mike D wrote:"Don't be a Bootsie"


Mike D wrote:" Don't be a BOOTSIE "
Henderson wrote:First off let me say, I had an extremely good time this past weekend. Flyboy was amazing and I hope we can have more events there! J.P. was everything I expected. Moose did an outstanding job keeping us fed! I could go on and on, but I just want to thank everyone who had a part in putting on this event.
Complaints.....
Now I just wanted to add in.... This being a "A-tier" event, and even though there was only 5 Rec players, I am sorely unhappy with both the payout (combined first and second was less than one persons entry fee!?) and we can't even blame it on 1st place getting a trophy... because Rec didn't get one.
Beyond that, the so called players award ceremony was something I would expect to see at a Sub "C-Tier" event.. There was absolutely no excitement at all... With 2 or 3 divisions going into sudden death I expected a lot more. Maybe it was my fault for expecting more... maybe not.. I will say this though, EVERY Single other "B" and "C" tier event I have participated in (7 to date) have announced scores for the pay outs or at least the top 3 and told how close the race was. This was my first look into an "A" tier event, and maybe all the negatives would have been worth it if my weekend was a week prior or later so I could watch the pros throw the same course I would/have played. I am not impressed at all with how this panned out. Hopefully someone will see this and consider making some adjustments to make it a more memorable event (in the positive instead of the negative)
DaltonDiscMan wrote:In the Am players pack, we had a copy of the 2009 A.O. I just put my copy in to watch it and it is telling me that it is disc #2, Sunday Action. I didn't realize there were 2 dvd's. Anyone know where I can get disc 1?
NathanielLR88 wrote:http://www.usdgc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Atlanta-Open-Performance-Leaderboard.pdf
THE RESULTS ARE IN!!!!!
and i see a promblem maybe..
i see no MA2's on this list. AT ALL
MA2 was suppose to be a qualifying division. and i dont see any names from INT at all. so your telling me no one even made the top 89? ya something seems fishy.
dandaman wrote:Tough to say (because so few people have a rating near mine) but I might of qualified. I'd much rather say that I did qualify though.
Rand- any chance of seeing the Intermediate players rounds go through? I was hoping to qualify so that I could play the famed USDGC course.
robdickens74 wrote:I guess none of the ma2s shot enough over their projected scores to make it is all i can figure after looking at it
robdickens74 wrote:I guess none of the ma2s shot enough over their projected scores to make it is all i can figure after looking at it
$Dollar$ wrote:The list is supposed to show EVERYONE that was eligible to qualify. That should include MA2 and it does NOT on their list. I'm not sure if anyone would have qualified from ma2, but they weren't even factored in. It looks like at least Bryan Huff should have made it.
rpetty1800 wrote:Anyways that is my two cents....
rpetty1800 wrote:Lets take a minute and imagine other sports doing the same thing.
Baseball.... Well the Braves and the Mets made it to the world series but the braves only won by 10 runs they had to win by 12 to win.
richardhead wrote:rpetty1800 wrote:Lets take a minute and imagine other sports doing the same thing.
Baseball.... Well the Braves and the Mets made it to the world series but the braves only won by 10 runs they had to win by 12 to win.
The Braves and The Mets! That would be totally impossible, unless you plan to do away with the American League entirely. Just sayin. lol Go Cubs!!!
i2rt wrote:I just got off the phone with Jonathan Poole and he agrees that there may be an error. He thinks that the AM2's could have been left off by mistake due to confusion over who played what course layout. I am putting together a list of people in AM2 that should have been included (850+ rating) along with their round scores. He will pass the info along to the number crunchers and get back to me soon. If you are eligible then you will get the invite.
Jonathan ask me to tell everyone he is sorry for the confusion. This is a new system and it is still being tweaked. This is the first tournament with the issues we ran into regarding 1 round of 27 and 2 rounds of 18. They had to do a lot of up front work to even enter the data.
That said...I find it interesting that you compare the handicap system to everything except the sport we are most closely associated with, golf
As for the USDGC making decisions about how it wants to run it's event, I wonder how much time/money you as individuals have spent supporting the event. I can assure you that as a collective whole you have done less than any one individual directly associated with the event.
During the AO I spoke at length with Jonathan about what the USDGC is doing. I think he probably would like to see the name changed as much as anyone but the legal and financial ramifications are enormous due to their ties to Winthrop, Innova and all the other sponsors. I am sure that 2 names will evolve over time even if unofficial. Maybe USDGC Gold and USDGC Blue.
Personally I am amazed that disc golf goes anywhere with all the negative attitudes (whining) every time someone tries to do something new or innovative. It is a miracle that we aren't still throwing a Frisbee towards a telephone pole. If you want disc golf your way then do something besides sitting behind a keyboard making others peoples corn flakes soggy.
Here is a thought, get out and run, volunteer or sponsor a tournament. Then you will actually have some veracity when speaking your mind.
I know what you guys are saying "there goes Bill being a jerk again"...maybe so but you guys act like you didn't get a cookie today at the daycare center. It takes time, commitment and hard work to grow the sport. Many (and I do mean many) of you haven't invested any of those things.
i2rt wrote:...
That said...I find it interesting that you compare the handicap system to everything except the sport we are most closely associated with, golf
rpetty1800 wrote:UFC... Well Lidale K.Oed him in the first round but the guys handicap said he only needed to last 1 min so he wins.... sorry Chuck Lidale.
Baseball.... Well the Braves and the Mets made it to the world series but the braves only won by 10 runs they had to win by 12 to win.
Golf .... Sorry tiger but you are to good you have to win by 15 strokes.
Nascar.... Well Dale You have to win by 2 laps or you lose...
any Olympic sport....
i2rt wrote:Personally I am amazed that disc golf goes anywhere with all the negative attitudes (whining) every time someone tries to do something new or innovative. It is a miracle that we aren't still throwing a Frisbee towards a telephone pole. If you want disc golf your way then do something besides sitting behind a keyboard making others peoples corn flakes soggy.
Here is a thought, get out and run, volunteer or sponsor a tournament. Then you will actually have some veracity when speaking your mind.
I know what you guys are saying "there goes Bill being a jerk again"...maybe so but you guys act like you didn't get a cookie today at the daycare center. It takes time, commitment and hard work to grow the sport. Many (and I do mean many) of you haven't invested any of those things.
i2rt wrote:Sorry I jumped on everybody for all of the complaining/suggesting. That is mostly based on the fact that all the complaining/suggesting is fruitless on the ADGO site. If you have issues then you need to contact Innova/Jonathan Poole. He is very interested in your ideas and comments.
i2rt wrote:Here is a thought, get out and run, volunteer or sponsor a tournament. Then you will actually have some veracity when speaking your mind.
Bhuff wrote:The actual usdgc round won't be handicapped will it..? Everyone starts even. And if you are invited, I'm assuming there is no adv field, you must play open?
i2rt wrote:I will leave the rest of the issues alone for now. The real discussion is about the USDGC, who qualified and various issues some people have with the format.
I am currently reviewing the data that Jonathan has compiled with the inclusion of the AM2's. I should have an answer back to him within the hour. Then it is up to him to discriminate that information. Some will be happy and some won't but this is a fair and balance handicapping system that is based on course SSA and an individuals rating as of the tournament date.
When I said to contact Jonathan I wasn't speaking from opinion. I have talked to Jonathan for several hours over the last few weeks. EVER time he says how much he wants to hear from you the players. Yesterday he ask me to post his email and phone number but I felt that the phone number was something that could be handled on an individual basis. There is no one out there that is more informed or able to do more to address your issues.
So I will say it again...PLEASE WRITE OR CALL JONATHAN POOLE IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO DISCUSS ABOUT USDGC.
jp@innovadiscs.com
jonathan.poole@innovadiscgolf.com
seven-zero-four-seven-two-four-one-three-five-two
D-Wiz wrote:I'll throw in -0.02 cents. The name thing doesn't seem to be that strong of a debate issue. It's their tournament, so they can continue to call it the USDGC. Squirrel fest/squirrel soiree doesn't really matter as long as we get another tourney at Redan. Meeks Madness will still be MM even if we switch it to a doubles event. As far as disrespecting past winners by calling it the USDGC, that doesn't hold much water either. The way the player's are treated, the payout, the ring, trophy and everything else, I doubt any of them have ever felt slighted by the USDGC and its staff and it would take a lot more than a name change to take away from the accomplishment and the way the winners are treated.
I think many of the top players will continue to play in the odd numbered years, so you can still see the best at Winthrop Gold from a spectator standpoint. The main difference is that this format opens the doors for anybody with minimum qualifications that plays well in a qualifier. I'd imagine most golfers would give their left nut to have a chance to play against Tiger in a tournament. Can you imagine the support and frenzy if golfers were given this opportunity from the PGA?
Innova is making this experience available to many in the sport that would otherwise never have a chance to play against the top players at one of the best tournaments. Plus, how many of the regional pros do you think have a chance at the "real" USDGC? There are about 10-15 touring pros that have a chance at the title no matter who the rest of the field is. If anything, this format could garner more interest from a larger percentage of the d-golf population from a spectator standpoint, because one of your buddies might be in it.
As far as the numbers and handicap system, (and forgive me because I haven't looked at the list too closely), but I think some of the top dogs were "in the hunt" with their projected scores. I don't think the USDGC staff will make it "easy" for anyone to win handicap or not and at the end of the day, if you have some of the big boys in the final group on Sunday and an underdog or two, then hee-haw, we might have another exciting final round at the Masters. Go Dustin Perry! (and congrats Dr. Manhattan on potentially getting invited)
richardhead wrote:Personally, I would play. I hope they keep the stroke+distance rule in effect this year. There's no way in hell that a 900-950 rated player will have the skill set to navigate this course and score well. Especially if they have to play with stroke and distance. There's a reason that only a handful of players have won this event. Just look at the consistency of play between Climo, Schultz, Feldberg, Nikko, Schusterick. Granted the last 2 are from a different breed of player, but they're smart enough to take there lumps and to attack when the time is right. I don't think the handicapping will have much affect on the Top 5-10, after that you will start seeing some of the lower rated players sprinkled in.
Jaronshaffer wrote:The results are in:
1. Dustin Perry
2. Bryan Huff
3. Nick Phillips
4. Bill Poleon
4. Brett Allen
6. Peter Charlton
7. Andy Kloiber
7. Brian Benton
7. Daniel May
7. Nathaniel Rushin
dandaman wrote:If you were invited to play and were able to, would you?
richardhead wrote:Personally, I would play. I hope they keep the stroke+distance rule in effect this year. There's no way in hell that a 900-950 rated player will have the skill set to navigate this course and score well. Especially if they have to play with stroke and distance. There's a reason that only a handful of players have won this event. Just look at the consistency of play between Climo, Schultz, Feldberg, Nikko, Schusterick. Granted the last 2 are from a different breed of player, but they're smart enough to take there lumps and to attack when the time is right. I don't think the handicapping will have much affect on the Top 5-10, after that you will start seeing some of the lower rated players sprinkled in.
dandaman wrote:Oh well. You're definetly entitled to your opinion, but I think this idea is great. Perhaps the tournament name should be changed on off years so as to differenate winners of a Pro USDGC and a handicapped USDGC, but I would highly suspect that the tournament atmosphere in either case is going to be absolutely amazing.
I like that they changed it up for this year. It has more of a festival feel to it rather than an ultra exclusive golf tournament. I am more interested in this years USDGC than in previous years.
Yet again Innova succeeds in bringing disc golf to the masses.
This highlights the core of this situation for me. I think (and of course I cant put words into your or anyones mouth) that you either want Disc golf to be taken seriously, big prestegious tournements that hightlight the sports best and legitimize this sport, or you want it to be be fun and feel like a festival and just another reason to get together with other golfers and party. ESPN isnt going to show up to film the sports best and its mediocre party and throw stuff around but if it stays big and actually got a real purse in their it could move in a legitimate direction. I realize it isnt going to be like football or golf but it could be taken seriously but definately not if we are trading out the biggest tournament for a festival type gig.
DaltonDiscMan wrote:
3.) Why couldn't Innova have like a Pro-Am like one of the PGA tourneys that is played early on in the season. They have 2 tourneys in one. One tourney is the AM's (John Elway, Tony Romo, several hockey players, etc. are normally pretty strong competitors) and another tourney is the Pro's. Either way, ALOT more important things have to change in the sport to get it close to the national media. I completely understand your point Manhattan and I know you literally don't mean ESPN, but any type of national attention.
dandaman wrote:This highlights the core of this situation for me. I think (and of course I cant put words into your or anyones mouth) that you either want Disc golf to be taken seriously, big prestegious tournements that hightlight the sports best and legitimize this sport, or you want it to be be fun and feel like a festival and just another reason to get together with other golfers and party. ESPN isnt going to show up to film the sports best and its mediocre party and throw stuff around but if it stays big and actually got a real purse in their it could move in a legitimate direction. I realize it isnt going to be like football or golf but it could be taken seriously but definately not if we are trading out the biggest tournament for a festival type gig.
Well that's the thing about disc golf. As most of us can agree disc golf is still very much in its infancy. While popular among its players it still has fallen short of reaching the conscience of the general masses. Even the head of the PDGA has stated that direction of disc golf should be focused on grassroots. If the top prize was ten times of what it has been payed in the past I still don't think it would garner much attention...at least not in non-disc golf circles
Innova has reached back and made this tournament attainable to those who for all intensive purposes would never be able to qualify. And in the process it has created a controversy that it has not seen before. Disc golf is for the common man, and now even more so. And while I definetly understand the argument on why this shouldn't be done, I can also understand a reason on why it should be.
I am genuinely excited that Innova, the PDGA, and our disc golf community want to continue to see disc golf thrive. Not everything they (we) try will be successful, but then again nothing ventured is nothing gained. I'd almost be willing to bet that this years USDGC will be the most talked about one yet.
DaltonDiscMan wrote:Several Random Thoughts/Questions:
1.) Someone stated that if (paraphrasing, I know I can quote but I am referencing several different ppl) an AM is rated a 920 and threw a 980, and Climo threw 20 under his rating, the AM would win. I know Innova is changing some things but are they taking the lowest score out of the equation to compute the winner? Are they going to use the "rating handicap" to calculate the winner? I would imagine that if a 920 throws a 980 and Climo throws a round well below his rating, Climo will still have fewer strokes. I thought the "rating handicap" was just to get more ppl playing.
2.) To Mashburn's point (that's scary to say) about Innova changing things and employing some ppl. who can think outside the box, I was in a meeting today w/our COO and I asked him what Einstein's definition of insanity is? Does it apply here? Maybe.............
3.) Why couldn't Innova have like a Pro-Am like one of the PGA tourneys that is played early on in the season. They have 2 tourneys in one. One tourney is the AM's (John Elway, Tony Romo, several hockey players, etc. are normally pretty strong competitors) and another tourney is the Pro's. Either way, ALOT more important things have to change in the sport to get it close to the national media. I completely understand your point Manhattan and I know you literally don't mean ESPN, but any type of national attention.
4.) I played so bad in the A.O. that if you took my best 18 holes from Fly Boy, and gave me a 27-hole rating, I still wouldn't of came close to qualifying. When I qualify for the USDGC, then you will know there is a major issue.
Dr. Manhattan wrote:DaltonDiscMan wrote:Several Random Thoughts/Questions:
1.) Someone stated that if (paraphrasing, I know I can quote but I am referencing several different ppl) an AM is rated a 920 and threw a 980, and Climo threw 20 under his rating, the AM would win. I know Innova is changing some things but are they taking the lowest score out of the equation to compute the winner? Are they going to use the "rating handicap" to calculate the winner? I would imagine that if a 920 throws a 980 and Climo throws a round well below his rating, Climo will still have fewer strokes. I thought the "rating handicap" was just to get more ppl playing.
2.) To Mashburn's point (that's scary to say) about Innova changing things and employing some ppl. who can think outside the box, I was in a meeting today w/our COO and I asked him what Einstein's definition of insanity is? Does it apply here? Maybe.............
3.) Why couldn't Innova have like a Pro-Am like one of the PGA tourneys that is played early on in the season. They have 2 tourneys in one. One tourney is the AM's (John Elway, Tony Romo, several hockey players, etc. are normally pretty
strong competitors) and another tourney is the Pro's. Either way, ALOT more important things have to change in the sport to get it close to the national media. I completely understand your point Manhattan and I know you literally don't mean ESPN, but any type of national attention.
4.) I played so bad in the A.O. that if you took my best 18 holes from Fly Boy, and gave me a 27-hole rating, I still wouldn't of came close to qualifying. When I qualify for the USDGC, then you will know there is a major issue.
i cant say I have read exactly but that is what a handicap is. Based on what your rating is you may start each round at 10 under par or -10 strokes. Just like when they rate a tournament so many strokes over 18 holes = a certain rating. so they use you rating to determine what you should throw on a given course. If based on your rating you should throw a 50 and based on climos he should throw a 40 well they even that out by giving you 10 strokes. Then if you throw better that your rating suggest and climo throws under his rating you would be way out in the lead. It is like I have been saying, if you are dave, Ken, Nikko or that caliber of player you have almost no chance of winning. to get an idea look that the qualification sheet and you can see how they do it. About Einstein, well obviously there need to be changes but Im not sure this is the right direction. Oh well though. The reason they cant have 2 is because according to them the cost of the tournement is too much. An am tournament wont have to be paid out so can be put together for much cheaper than a pro tournement with a 12K purse. If you cant swing 1 then 2 isnt going to happen.
keith johnson wrote:On a par 50-54 it is approx 1 stroke per every 10 ratings point, at par 55-60 between 8-9 points per stroke, par 61-65 about 7-8 and par 68-72 around 5-6 points per stroke - so if I was guessing at USDGC a 1000 rated round by a golfer shooting a par 68, would be about a 950 rated round shooting a 78.
Look at official round ratings for the Memorial - at Fountain Hills it was 10 points per stroke for the 18 holes, while it was 7 points per stroke for the 18 holes at Vista.
For the A/O it was 8 points per stroke at JP and 5 points per stroke difference at Fly Boy.
So using the Kellner logic - a player shooting 10 points OVER his rating would only gain 1- 2 strokes on ANY PAR course layout that exists for ratings (50-72) to a player that shot his rating. If he shot the 921,922, 921,932 as stated he would only gain 1- 2 strokes TOTAL on Climo shooting his rating, or if Ken shot 20 below each round he would gain 8-10 TOTAL strokes - still beating him but not by 10 per round.
You can find out everything you need to know about ratings (including a FAQ Section) here: http://www.pdga.com/ratings
DaltonDiscMan wrote:Isn't everyones round rating based on what the winning score of the pro/highest division?
PDGA Ratings FAQ wrote:How are ratings for an event calculated?
The scores thrown by propagators each round are used to calculate the SSA rating for a specific course layout. A propagator is a current member whose rating is over 799 and is based on at least 8 rounds. As long as there are 5 propagators playing a course layout, ratings can be calculated. The average rating of all propagators will equal the average rating they get for the round – always. If the same course layout is used more than one round, the scores from multiple rounds will be used to determine an overall SSA, as long as the individual round SSAs come out close to each other, so everyone gets the same rating for the same score on the same course. If the SSAs are significantly different, likely due to varying wind conditions, the round ratings will be calculated separately. If a propagator shoots more than 60 points below their rating, their score will not be used in the SSA calculations.
Return to Disc Golf Tournaments
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests